http://crschmidt.net/blog/243/google-projection-900913/ Ramblings of a GIS Hacker Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:47:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 http://crschmidt.net/blog/243/google-projection-900913/#comment-19715 paul mccullough Wed, 07 May 2008 16:57:31 +0000 http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/243/google-projection-900913/#comment-19715 Hey Chris, Quick question... RE the post gis insert statement - why is the srid == 96? I was expecting 900913. Thanks Paul Hey Chris,
Quick question…
RE the post gis insert statement - why is the srid == 96?
I was expecting 900913.
Thanks
Paul

]]> http://crschmidt.net/blog/243/google-projection-900913/#comment-18725 Allan Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:42:16 +0000 http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/243/google-projection-900913/#comment-18725 I don't think it would be a bad thing to have a non-EPSG authority for some set of neo-geography SRS's. On the other hand, since you do have to worry about a number collision, it may be time to have name spaces or even URI instead of numbers. I think EPSG:4326, or even 4326 are valid URI forms. So is http://spatialreference.org/ref/user/6 I don’t think it would be a bad thing to have a non-EPSG authority for some set of neo-geography SRS’s. On the other hand, since you do have to worry about a number collision, it may be time to have name spaces or even URI instead of numbers. I think EPSG:4326, or even 4326 are valid URI forms. So is http://spatialreference.org/ref/user/6

]]> http://crschmidt.net/blog/243/google-projection-900913/#comment-18722 David Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:25:52 +0000 http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/243/google-projection-900913/#comment-18722 5VV337! 5VV337!

]]> http://crschmidt.net/blog/243/google-projection-900913/#comment-18721 Morten Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:05:32 +0000 http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/243/google-projection-900913/#comment-18721 Google in 1337 speak is 600613. I think you should instead raise the concern with EPSG. The more people that pledge their case, the better chance there is that they will include it. Google in 1337 speak is 600613.
I think you should instead raise the concern with EPSG. The more people that pledge their case, the better chance there is that they will include it.

]]>