<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RDF Query</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crschmidt.net/blog/57/rdf-query/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/57/rdf-query/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a GIS Hacker</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kasei</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/57/rdf-query/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>kasei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 21:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/57/rdf-query/#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>To be clear, "based only on the SPARQL grammar" isn't really what happened. It's "based on the RDQL grammar," and then hacked up and put back together by looking at examples of new new SPARQL syntax. I need to fix that and, you know, actually look at the SPARQL grammar at some point, but it works on the simple stuff right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, &#8220;based only on the SPARQL grammar&#8221; isn&#8217;t really what happened. It&#8217;s &#8220;based on the RDQL grammar,&#8221; and then hacked up and put back together by looking at examples of new new SPARQL syntax. I need to fix that and, you know, actually look at the SPARQL grammar at some point, but it works on the simple stuff right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
