<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GovTrack RDF Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crschmidt.net/blog/58/govtrack-rdf-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/58/govtrack-rdf-data/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a GIS Hacker</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Tauberer</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/58/govtrack-rdf-data/#comment-1811</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Tauberer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/58/govtrack-rdf-data/#comment-1811</guid>
		<description>Neat!  Don't know if you've seen &lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/rdfbrowse.xpd"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.  It helps for (mentally) visualizing the data.  (And, BTW, the data gets *much* more interesting once the N3 files are loaded, although it takes me a good few hours to get it all into MySQL.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat!  Don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/rdfbrowse.xpd">this</a>.  It helps for (mentally) visualizing the data.  (And, BTW, the data gets *much* more interesting once the N3 files are loaded, although it takes me a good few hours to get it all into MySQL.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/58/govtrack-rdf-data/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/58/govtrack-rdf-data/#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>Hm... but the joins are against the node tables, no? It still has to look up the indexes in those Node tables. I suppose that's not much time unless, like me, you've got indexes that are larger than your keycache. Then you have to fall back to disks, which are impossibly slow.

I suppose everything is indexed six ways from Sunday, so it's really a moot point for most things. I just have a slow computer and like dealing with impossibly large datasets :)

So, starting in an existing Model is slow, a new Model is faster, and a new Database even faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm&#8230; but the joins are against the node tables, no? It still has to look up the indexes in those Node tables. I suppose that&#8217;s not much time unless, like me, you&#8217;ve got indexes that are larger than your keycache. Then you have to fall back to disks, which are impossibly slow.</p>
<p>I suppose everything is indexed six ways from Sunday, so it&#8217;s really a moot point for most things. I just have a slow computer and like dealing with impossibly large datasets <img src='http://crschmidt.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So, starting in an existing Model is slow, a new Model is faster, and a new Database even faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morten Frederiksen</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/58/govtrack-rdf-data/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten Frederiksen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/58/govtrack-rdf-data/#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>Re #3:

That's not quite right. The select issued to check for existing statements only involve the StatementsX table, not the node tables. Thus, loading into a new model will be faster.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re #3:</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not quite right. The select issued to check for existing statements only involve the StatementsX table, not the node tables. Thus, loading into a new model will be faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
