<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TileCache: Map Tile Caching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/181/tilecache-map-tile-caching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/181/tilecache-map-tile-caching/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a GIS Hacker</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Seepe</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/181/tilecache-map-tile-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-19628</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Seepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/181/tilecache-map-tile-caching/#comment-19628</guid>
		<description>You mentioned "serious services" for hosting and deploying large datasets. Could you identify a few of them for us?

We have a large library of high resolution aerial orthorectified imagery (100s of TB). We have a client needed to Google Fusion pre-process perhaps 2 PB of data. Many of our customers are each in the 4 - 8 TB range. 

The applied research work you are doing here has substantial implications on our ability to deliver imagery for 2D and 3D online (and offline) mapping applications.

Any insight and assistance would be truly and greatly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mentioned &#8220;serious services&#8221; for hosting and deploying large datasets. Could you identify a few of them for us?</p>
<p>We have a large library of high resolution aerial orthorectified imagery (100s of TB). We have a client needed to Google Fusion pre-process perhaps 2 PB of data. Many of our customers are each in the 4 - 8 TB range. </p>
<p>The applied research work you are doing here has substantial implications on our ability to deliver imagery for 2D and 3D online (and offline) mapping applications.</p>
<p>Any insight and assistance would be truly and greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Holmes</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/181/tilecache-map-tile-caching/comment-page-1/#comment-10492</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/181/tilecache-map-tile-caching/#comment-10492</guid>
		<description>Actually, &lt;a href='http://chris.narx.net/2006/10/28/osgeo-tiling-spec/'&gt;Chris Tweedie&lt;/a&gt; wrote the post on S3, my post was more about using EC2 to do a batch processing job to generate all the tiles you need.  Tiles for large datasets can take days if not weeks, with computing on demand from EC2 you could do it in much less time, throw a thousand servers at it.  Though even better would be distributed processing of tiles, so people could volunteer processing power to create a huge tile set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, <a href='http://chris.narx.net/2006/10/28/osgeo-tiling-spec/'>Chris Tweedie</a> wrote the post on S3, my post was more about using EC2 to do a batch processing job to generate all the tiles you need.  Tiles for large datasets can take days if not weeks, with computing on demand from EC2 you could do it in much less time, throw a thousand servers at it.  Though even better would be distributed processing of tiles, so people could volunteer processing power to create a huge tile set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

