<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: early commits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/290/early-commits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/290/early-commits/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a GIS Hacker</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: crschmidt</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/290/early-commits/comment-page-1/#comment-19251</link>
		<dc:creator>crschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/290/early-commits/#comment-19251</guid>
		<description>Since my work on OpenLayers and other open source projects is largely to support MetaCarta, I follow MetaCarta policy, which is to ship with copyrights that are up to the current year even if the file hasn't been touched. I also followed a similar policy when designing websites -- I was under the impression that it was only there for content which had *actually changed*, but we went through and updated all the websites we maintained to be through the new year when I was working at wedü.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since my work on OpenLayers and other open source projects is largely to support MetaCarta, I follow MetaCarta policy, which is to ship with copyrights that are up to the current year even if the file hasn&#8217;t been touched. I also followed a similar policy when designing websites &#8212; I was under the impression that it was only there for content which had *actually changed*, but we went through and updated all the websites we maintained to be through the new year when I was working at wedü.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Newton</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/290/early-commits/comment-page-1/#comment-19250</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 10:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/290/early-commits/#comment-19250</guid>
		<description>That reminds me of when I was active on the perl5-porters mailing list. IIRC, there was at one point a discussion of whether copyright notices in source files should be updated for the new year or not.

I thought the idea was that you only need to update the date on a file if you've actually touched the file during that year, but I could be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me of when I was active on the perl5-porters mailing list. IIRC, there was at one point a discussion of whether copyright notices in source files should be updated for the new year or not.</p>
<p>I thought the idea was that you only need to update the date on a file if you&#8217;ve actually touched the file during that year, but I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

