<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python Decorators: What they are underneath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/352/python-decorators-what-they-are-underneath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/352/python-decorators-what-they-are-underneath/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a GIS Hacker</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: crschmidt</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/352/python-decorators-what-they-are-underneath/comment-page-1/#comment-20096</link>
		<dc:creator>crschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/?p=352#comment-20096</guid>
		<description>Jeremy: 

Perhaps I don't understand Jython version numbering, but generally I assume 'bX' to be indicitive of a beta release. In fact, the Jython project still says "For production use please continue to use Jython 2.2.1." So, it seems to me that Jython is still at 2.2 for anyone who wants to work in production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy: </p>
<p>Perhaps I don&#8217;t understand Jython version numbering, but generally I assume &#8216;bX&#8217; to be indicitive of a beta release. In fact, the Jython project still says &#8220;For production use please continue to use Jython 2.2.1.&#8221; So, it seems to me that Jython is still at 2.2 for anyone who wants to work in production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Dunck</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/352/python-decorators-what-they-are-underneath/comment-page-1/#comment-20095</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Dunck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/?p=352#comment-20095</guid>
		<description>FWIW, Jython 2.5b0 was released in October.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, Jython 2.5b0 was released in October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Gillies</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/352/python-decorators-what-they-are-underneath/comment-page-1/#comment-20092</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Gillies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/?p=352#comment-20092</guid>
		<description>Glad you liked it. You're right, decoration is largely syntatic sugar, but it standardizes the technique, promotes DRY, and makes the wrapping very obvious to a programmers eye. My eye, at least.

I disagree that use of decorators means that my code is "only forward looking". 
Decorators appeared in Python 2.4, in 2004. 4 years of backwards compatibility is pretty good, I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you liked it. You&#8217;re right, decoration is largely syntatic sugar, but it standardizes the technique, promotes DRY, and makes the wrapping very obvious to a programmers eye. My eye, at least.</p>
<p>I disagree that use of decorators means that my code is &#8220;only forward looking&#8221;.<br />
Decorators appeared in Python 2.4, in 2004. 4 years of backwards compatibility is pretty good, I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
