<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python/Redland Powered RDF Validator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/75/pythonredland-powered-rdf-validator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/75/pythonredland-powered-rdf-validator/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a GIS Hacker</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/75/pythonredland-powered-rdf-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-2021</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/75/pythonredland-powered-rdf-validator/#comment-2021</guid>
		<description>I sure hope those aren't conformance tests, because if so, they did a piss poor job of them. A couple things I noticed right off the bat: 

RDF Model Syntax: Tar file is only symlinks. Completely useless, as I don't have the files there, otherwise I wouldn't've downloaded the tarball! Several of the files include HTML: ms_7.7 seem to exhibit this. I'm not sure if these are supposed to be some kind of RDF-in-HTML example though, so I'm not sure if this is by design.

Seems much more likely you were thinking of the test cases linked from http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/ (an unlinked subdirectory from the one you gave, as far as I can see). There's a lot of tests there though, and I'm not the kind of guy that runs a test suite very often.

The real person to ask that question to would be dajobe: the "validator" is just running the RDF/XML parser over the given URI. I'm pretty sure that his parser conforms to all the test cases, but he'd really be the one to ask, although I'm not completely sure the question isn't already answered on &lt;a href="http://librdf.org/"&gt;Redland's Home Page&lt;/a&gt; somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope those aren&#8217;t conformance tests, because if so, they did a piss poor job of them. A couple things I noticed right off the bat: </p>
<p>RDF Model Syntax: Tar file is only symlinks. Completely useless, as I don&#8217;t have the files there, otherwise I wouldn&#8217;t've downloaded the tarball! Several of the files include HTML: ms_7.7 seem to exhibit this. I&#8217;m not sure if these are supposed to be some kind of RDF-in-HTML example though, so I&#8217;m not sure if this is by design.</p>
<p>Seems much more likely you were thinking of the test cases linked from <a href="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/</a> (an unlinked subdirectory from the one you gave, as far as I can see). There&#8217;s a lot of tests there though, and I&#8217;m not the kind of guy that runs a test suite very often.</p>
<p>The real person to ask that question to would be dajobe: the &#8220;validator&#8221; is just running the RDF/XML parser over the given URI. I&#8217;m pretty sure that his parser conforms to all the test cases, but he&#8217;d really be the one to ask, although I&#8217;m not completely sure the question isn&#8217;t already answered on <a href="http://librdf.org/">Redland&#8217;s Home Page</a> somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Cerra</title>
		<link>http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/75/pythonredland-powered-rdf-validator/comment-page-1/#comment-2018</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Cerra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 01:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crschmidt.net/blog/archives/75/pythonredland-powered-rdf-validator/#comment-2018</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice!  Too bad there isn't a form to upload RDF fragments (like the W3C's validator) but still cool.  Does it pass all of the conformance tests linked from the W3C at &lt;http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!  Too bad there isn&#8217;t a form to upload RDF fragments (like the W3C&#8217;s validator) but still cool.  Does it pass all of the conformance tests linked from the W3C at &lt;http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

