{"id":32,"date":"2005-02-17T21:40:43","date_gmt":"2005-02-18T02:40:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/?p=32"},"modified":"2005-02-17T21:40:43","modified_gmt":"2005-02-18T02:40:43","slug":"livejournal-foaf-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/archives\/32\/livejournal-foaf-update\/","title":{"rendered":"LiveJournal FOAF Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So, a long time ago, I posted about how I planned to update the FOAF that LiveJournal spits out to become more friendly, since I really didn&#8217;t know anything about RDF at all when I was first creating the format. So, I wanted to do some updates, to match things that I had discussed with members of the FOAF community over time.<\/p>\n<p>However, I got a real job, lost my free time, blah blah blah, these things happen. The patch has sat around in various incarnations for at least 6 months, probably longer. Recently, someone asked me what had happened to it, and I responded that I had gotten tired of pushing for changes to FOAF, and given up. He said he had time to spare on pushing people, so I cleaned up my patch, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.livejournal.com\/community\/ljfoaf\/6449.html\">posted about it<\/a> &#8211; a detailed rundown of the changes the patch makes, for evaluation by the community.<\/p>\n<p>Since the community involved is larger than LiveJournal, I&#8217;m here to encourage absolutely anyone who might have an interest or knowledge in the arena to read through the explanation or the patch, and let me know what they think. I really would love to see this happen, but like I said, I&#8217;m not going to fight for it anymore: it took a lot of hard work to get the previous FOAF patch accepted, and I just don&#8217;t have the energy or free time to do that again. So, this one is going to depend on community feedback and demonstration of interest. If you think that LiveJournal&#8217;s FOAF data might be suboptimal, say something about it. That entry is a great place to comment and discuss. Open a dialouge with developers about what you&#8217;d like to see, because if enough people want to see it, someone may actually push it in.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So, a long time ago, I posted about how I planned to update the FOAF that LiveJournal spits out to become more friendly, since I really didn&#8217;t know anything about RDF at all when I was first creating the format. So, I wanted to do some updates, to match things that I had discussed with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-foaf","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crschmidt.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}